(Source: kk.org)
(Source: kk.org)
(Source: ctrl-shift.co.uk)
So there are two classes of data which help solve different types of problem. Big Data is statistical and deals with general trends and patterns; Very Small Data is specific and deals with getting things done: gathering the information needed to make a decision, to make an arrangement, or to get some administrative chore done. Because it’s Very Small and rather mundane and specific, it doesn’t seem as glamorous and important as Big Data. But it is.
In fact, this is where our economy’s next big productivity breakthrough is going to come from: information logistics – getting exactly the right information to and from the right people at the right time so we can solve problems, make decisions, organise and implement things without wasting time and effort looking for the right data or sifting through and discarding the wrong data.
(Source: kschroeder.com)
(Source: Boing Boing)
analyst on today’s announcement that the US Postal Service will be making $3billion in cuts to its First Class delivery service.
So, “almost” nothing? That “almost” includes a ton, if you want it to. Here’s just one example—I intend to keep making those as long as I can.
(Source: Guardian)
The shiny bright City of Tomorrow is also full of slums and favelas.
We get stuff wrong. Property development magnates build gated communities for billionaires that open for business just as the real estate market crashes. The office buildings of a booming middle eastern emirate go up so fast that the municipal sewage system can’t cope so skyscrapers end up being serviced by huge queues of sewage trucks. Country dwellers migrate to cities that can’t expand fast enough to give them adequate housing, so they end up in favelas and shanty towns. And people keep driving ancient automobiles long after Ford or General Motors would like to have sold them a new one…Part of the problem is that we build rafts of infrastructure on top of existing design decisions. Which means that fixing a bad decision requires the abandonment of lots of stuff that depends on it.
(Source: michaelbabwahsingh.com)
(Source: edge.org)
(Source: kickerstudio.com)
I just received this book, A House in Space, in the mail from my friend, Michael Babwahsingh. He bookmarked a passage from toward the end of the book that, though spoken decades ago—before much of the technological landscape we know today was created, seems incredibly relevant to our predicament:
I came to realize…that what we were doing was taking a human and making him function in a way he was not designed to. We were trying to function at a higher level of efficiency than we could. I then proceeded to make errors and berate myself. Finally I came to the realization that I’m a fallible human being, that I cannot operate at a hundred percent efficiency, that I am going to make mistakes. when I tried to operate like a machine, I was a gross failure. Now I’m trying to operate as a human being within the limitations I possess…I think a person neediest to more or less re-create himself, to pause and reflect occasionally…I think that in order to act creatively, you have to have certain periods of time when you have to just stop and think and see yourself, and be aware of the situation, and sort of involve yourself in the totality of the experience at hand. We’ve got to appreciate a human being for what he is.
— William Pogue, American Astronaut (page 165)
(Source: hilobrow.com)
It gets very much like Baudrillard in a way. We lived in a real world where we created value, and understood the value that we created as individuals and groups for one another. Then we systematically disconnected from the real world: from ourselves, from one another, and from the value we create, and reconnected to an artificial landscape of derivative value of working for corporations and false gods and all that. It is in some sense Baudrillard’s three steps of life in the simulacra.
So by now, as Borges would say, we’ve mistaken the map for the territory. We’ve mistaken our jobs for work. We’ve mistaken our bank accounts for savings. We’ve mistaken our 401k investments for our future. We’ve mistaken our property for assets, and our assets for the world. We have these places where we live, then they become property that we own, then they become mortgages that we owe, then they become mortgage-backed loans that our pensions finance, then they become packages of debt, and so on and so on.
We’ve been living in a world where the further up the chain of abstraction you operate, the wealthier you are.
(Source: hilobrow.com)
I’m not usually a conspiracy theorist about these things, but I think the reason why we celebrate the Renaissance as a high point of western culture is really a marketing campaign. It was a way for Renaissance monarchs and nation-states, and the industrial age powers that followed, to recast the end of one of the most vibrant human civilizations we’ve had, as a dark, plague-ridden, horrible time.
Historically, the plague arrived after the invention of the chartered corporation, and after central currency was mandated. Central currency became law, and 40 years later you get the plague. People got that poor that quickly. They were no longer allowed to use the land. It shifted from an abundance model to a scarcity model; from an economy based on annual grain production to one based on gold released by the king.
|#