Vice President of Newfangled.com, Writer for PRINT and F+W Media, blogger, infrequent designer, reader, science fiction enthusiast...
Jaron Lanier (It was hard to know where to start and stop transcribing this—it’s from a video—because he really packs in a ton of interesting ideas into a small verbal space.)

(Source: edge.org)

Posted at 8:58am and tagged with: quote,.

I’m really kind of astonished at how readily a great many people I know—young people—have accepted a reduced economic prospect and limited freedoms, in any meaningful way, and traded them for being able to screw around online. There’s a lot of people who feel that being able to get their video or their tweet to be seen by somebody once in a while gives them enough ego gratification that it’s ok with them to be still living with their parents in their thirties. That’s such a strange tradeoff and if you project that forward obviously it really does become a problem. I think that leads to a world that Wells and Kurt Vonnegut and many others wrote about where there just is enough virtual bread and circuses—just barely enough to keep the poor in check and they just kind of whither away through attrition or something.
Jack Schulze

(Source: kickerstudio.com)

Posted at 8:30am and tagged with: quote,.

Some people (they are wrong) say design is about solving problems. Obviously designers do solve problems, but then so do dentists. Design is about cultural invention. There are some people who want to reduce the domain of design to listable, knowable stuff, so it’s easy to talk about. Design is a glamorous, glittering world and this means they can engage without having to actually risk themselves on the outcome of their work. This is damaging. It turns design into something terrified of invention. Design is about risk. We all fear authentic public response to our work, but we have to be brave enough to overcome.

A review for this book by “A Customer” reads:

”_The Monster At The End Of This Book_ (henceforth “TMATEOTB”) is a fascinating treatise on several of the philosophical problems lurking at the core of modern and classical thought. The premise — that, with the turn of each page, the reader brings self-described “lovable, furry Grover” closer to danger at the hands of the title monster — allows one to question the very nature of free will and destiny. Is Grover doomed to encounter the monster? The conceit that it is the act of turning pages — the literal act of reading itself — that causes the ending to come about inevitably leads to the question: Would the book end differently if one _didn’t_ finish reading it? On another level, TMATEOTB addresses one of the paradoxes of contemporary physics: The equality of space and time. The “end of the book” is an event in the future, but the monster is not spoken of as “arriving”, but as _already being there_. Thus, turning pages moves the reader and Grover not only forward in time, as in most traditional literature, but also forward in space, leading to the perilous End of the Book. Lastly, TMATEOTB is about how we are ultimately at the whim of the cosmic forces that shape our lives. The hapless protagonist tries again and again to stop the reader from turning pages by erecting brick walls and nailing one page to the other. His efforts are futile, but he remains unaware of his essential helplessness in the face of a Reader. Perhaps, the book says, we are ultimately doomed to fail, trapped within the pages of cosmic irony, but unable to prevent or even perceive the inevitability of our encounter with the monster. The shocking twist ending wraps up the disparate threads of the text, presenting issues of self-knowledge, the nature of fear, and the question of what it truly means to be a monster. Perhaps the failure of our quests for safety in an uncertain world isn’t so bad, it argues, if it leads to a confrontation like the one depicted in _The Monster At The End Of This Book_.”

Degree awarded. Moving on…

Posted at 8:50am and tagged with: strange,.

A review for this book by “A Customer” reads:

”_The Monster At The End Of This Book_ (henceforth “TMATEOTB”) is a fascinating treatise on several of the philosophical problems lurking at the core of modern and classical thought. The premise — that, with the turn of each page, the reader brings self-described “lovable, furry Grover” closer to danger at the hands of the title monster — allows one to question the very nature of free will and destiny. Is Grover doomed to encounter the monster? The conceit that it is the act of turning pages — the literal act of reading itself — that causes the ending to come about inevitably leads to the question: Would the book end differently if one _didn’t_ finish reading it? On another level, TMATEOTB addresses one of the paradoxes of contemporary physics: The equality of space and time. The “end of the book” is an event in the future, but the monster is not spoken of as “arriving”, but as _already being there_. Thus, turning pages moves the reader and Grover not only forward in time, as in most traditional literature, but also forward in space, leading to the perilous End of the Book. Lastly, TMATEOTB is about how we are ultimately at the whim of the cosmic forces that shape our lives. The hapless protagonist tries again and again to stop the reader from turning pages by erecting brick walls and nailing one page to the other. His efforts are futile, but he remains unaware of his essential helplessness in the face of a Reader. Perhaps, the book says, we are ultimately doomed to fail, trapped within the pages of cosmic irony, but unable to prevent or even perceive the inevitability of our encounter with the monster. The shocking twist ending wraps up the disparate threads of the text, presenting issues of self-knowledge, the nature of fear, and the question of what it truly means to be a monster. Perhaps the failure of our quests for safety in an uncertain world isn’t so bad, it argues, if it leads to a confrontation like the one depicted in _The Monster At The End Of This Book_.”

Degree awarded. Moving on…

I just received this book, A House in Space, in the mail from my friend, Michael Babwahsingh. He bookmarked a passage from toward the end of the book that, though spoken decades ago—before much of the technological landscape we know today was created, seems incredibly relevant to our predicament:

I came to realize…that what we were doing was taking a human and making him function in a way he was not designed to. We were trying to function at a higher level of efficiency than we could. I then proceeded to make errors and berate myself. Finally I came to the realization that I’m a fallible human being, that I cannot operate at a hundred percent efficiency, that I am going to make mistakes. when I tried to operate like a machine, I was a gross failure. Now I’m trying to operate as a human being within the limitations I possess…I think a person neediest to more or less re-create himself, to pause and reflect occasionally…I think that in order to act creatively, you have to have certain periods of time when you have to just stop and think and see yourself, and be aware of the situation, and sort of involve yourself in the totality of the experience at hand. We’ve got to appreciate a human being for what he is.

— William Pogue, American Astronaut (page 165)

Posted at 1:42pm and tagged with: quote, book,.

I just received this book, A House in Space, in the mail from my friend, Michael Babwahsingh. He bookmarked a passage from toward the end of the book that, though spoken decades ago—before much of the technological landscape we know today was created, seems incredibly relevant to our predicament:

I came to realize…that what we were doing was taking a human and making him function in a way he was not designed to. We were trying to function at a higher level of efficiency than we could. I then proceeded to make errors and berate myself. Finally I came to the realization that I’m a fallible human being, that I cannot operate at a hundred percent efficiency, that I am going to make mistakes. when I tried to operate like a machine, I was a gross failure. Now I’m trying to operate as a human being within the limitations I possess…I think a person neediest to more or less re-create himself, to pause and reflect occasionally…I think that in order to act creatively, you have to have certain periods of time when you have to just stop and think and see yourself, and be aware of the situation, and sort of involve yourself in the totality of the experience at hand. We’ve got to appreciate a human being for what he is.
— William Pogue, American Astronaut (page 165)
Doug Rushkoff

(Source: hilobrow.com)

Posted at 1:21pm and tagged with: quote,.

It gets very much like Baudrillard in a way. We lived in a real world where we created value, and understood the value that we created as individuals and groups for one another. Then we systematically disconnected from the real world: from ourselves, from one another, and from the value we create, and reconnected to an artificial landscape of derivative value of working for corporations and false gods and all that. It is in some sense Baudrillard’s three steps of life in the simulacra.

So by now, as Borges would say, we’ve mistaken the map for the territory. We’ve mistaken our jobs for work. We’ve mistaken our bank accounts for savings. We’ve mistaken our 401k investments for our future. We’ve mistaken our property for assets, and our assets for the world. We have these places where we live, then they become property that we own, then they become mortgages that we owe, then they become mortgage-backed loans that our pensions finance, then they become packages of debt, and so on and so on.

We’ve been living in a world where the further up the chain of abstraction you operate, the wealthier you are.

Doug Rushkoff

(Source: hilobrow.com)

Posted at 11:22am and tagged with: quote,.

I’m not usually a conspiracy theorist about these things, but I think the reason why we celebrate the Renaissance as a high point of western culture is really a marketing campaign. It was a way for Renaissance monarchs and nation-states, and the industrial age powers that followed, to recast the end of one of the most vibrant human civilizations we’ve had, as a dark, plague-ridden, horrible time.

Historically, the plague arrived after the invention of the chartered corporation, and after central currency was mandated. Central currency became law, and 40 years later you get the plague. People got that poor that quickly. They were no longer allowed to use the land. It shifted from an abundance model to a scarcity model; from an economy based on annual grain production to one based on gold released by the king.

William Gibson

(Source: theparisreview.org)

Posted at 6:47pm and tagged with: quote,.

I think the popular perception that we’re a lot like the Victorians is in large part correct. One way is that we’re all constantly in a state of ongoing t­echnoshock, without really being aware of it—it’s just become where we live. The Victorians were the first people to experience that, and I think it made them crazy in new ways. We’re still riding that wave of craziness. We’ve gotten so used to emergent technologies that we get anxious if we haven’t had one in a while.

But if you read the accounts of people who rode steam trains for the first time, for instance, they went a little crazy. They’d traveled fifteen miles an hour, and when they were writing the accounts afterward they struggled to describe that unthinkable speed and what this linear velocity does to a perspective as you’re looking forward. There was even a Victorian medical complaint called “railway spine.”

Emergent technologies were irreversibly altering their landscape. Bleak House is a quintessential Victorian text, but it is also probably the best steam­punk landscape that will ever be. Dickens really nailed it, especially in those proto-Ballardian passages in which everything in nature has been damaged by heavy industry. But there were relatively few voices like Dickens then. Most people thought the progress of industry was all very exciting. Only a few were saying, Hang on, we think the birds are dying.

William Gibson

(Source: theparisreview.org)

Posted at 6:25pm and tagged with: science-fiction, quote,.

I didn’t have a manifesto. I had some discontent. It seemed to me that midcentury mainstream American science fiction had often been triumphalist and militaristic, a sort of folk propaganda for American exceptionalism. I was tired of America-as-the-future, the world as a white monoculture, the protagonist as a good guy from the middle class or above. I wanted there to be more elbow room. I wanted to make room for antiheroes.

I also wanted science fiction to be more naturalistic. There had been a poverty of description in much of it. The technology depicted was so slick and clean that it was practically invisible. What would any given SF favorite look like if we could crank up the resolution? As it was then, much of it was like video games before the invention of fractal dirt. I wanted to see dirt in the corners.

A Year of Ideas, Volume 3

Well, here we are at the end of 2011 and Volume 3 of A Year of Ideas is ready. Just like the past two volumes, I spent the past year reading a ton on the web (something around 1500 articles) and bookmarking the most interesting stuff for possible inclusion in Volume 3. I ended setting aside 61 articles and have spent the last couple of months editing that list down to 25, creating the interior design and cover, and getting them printed by Lulu.com (if you want to read more about how that works, check out last year’s entry). They just arrived and I’m pretty excited and happy with how they turned out…

Read more about it >

Posted at 9:31am and tagged with: mixbook,.

A Year of Ideas, Volume 3
Well, here we are at the end of 2011 and Volume 3 of A Year of Ideas is ready. Just like the past two volumes, I spent the past year reading a ton on the web (something around 1500 articles) and bookmarking the most interesting stuff for possible inclusion in Volume 3. I ended setting aside 61 articles and have spent the last couple of months editing that list down to 25, creating the interior design and cover, and getting them printed by Lulu.com (if you want to read more about how that works, check out last year’s entry). They just arrived and I’m pretty excited and happy with how they turned out…
Read more about it >

Making Sense of the Data

This week I’ve had the privilege of attending and speaking at the HOW Interactive Design Conference. Rounding out a program that included many fascinating topics presented by a fantastic, talented group of people, I focused on what, comparatively, is the boring side of interactive design: making sense of the data.

For those of you who couldn’t make it out in person, this article will compose everything I shared, just moments ago, at HOW…plus a bit more.

What You’ll Learn

  • How to start regularly gathering data that provides enlightening, qualitative insights
  • How to meaningfully connect metrics from analytics tools
  • How to gather data from real, live people

Ready? Let’s get started…

Posted at 10:25am and tagged with: measurement, web-development, design,.

Making Sense of the Data
This week I’ve had the privilege of attending and speaking at the HOW Interactive Design Conference. Rounding out a program that included many fascinating topics presented by a fantastic, talented group of people, I focused on what, comparatively, is the boring side of interactive design: making sense of the data.
For those of you who couldn’t make it out in person, this article will compose everything I shared, just moments ago, at HOW…plus a bit more.
What You’ll Learn
How to start regularly gathering data that provides enlightening, qualitative insights
How to meaningfully connect metrics from analytics tools
How to gather data from real, live people
Ready? Let’s get started…
Brandon Keim, reflecting upon Earth’s population reaching 7 billion as of today

(Source: Wired)

Posted at 7:49am.

Altogether, roughly 20 percent of Earth’s net terrestrial primary production, the sheer volume of life produced on land on this planet every year, is harvested for human purposes — and, to return to the comparative factoids, it’s all for a species that accounts for .00018 percent of Earth’s non-marine biomass.

We are the .00018 percent, and we use 20 percent. The purpose of that number isn’t to induce guilt, or blame humanity. The point of that number is perspective. At this snapshot in life’s history, at — per the insights of James C. Rettie, who imagined life on Earth as a yearlong movie — a few minutes after 11:45 p.m. on December 31, we are big. Very big.

Beautiful. Steve Jobs’ last words, from his sister’s eulogy

Posted at 2:47pm and tagged with: wonder, quote,.

OH WOW. OH WOW. OH WOW.
Alvin Toffler

(Source: foreignpolicy.com)

Posted at 12:12pm and tagged with: futurism,.

The future arrives too soon and in the wrong order.
Curtis White, on “The Late Word”

(Source: laphamsquarterly.org)

Posted at 2:40pm and tagged with: books, digital-literacy,.

We know that the major players are positioning themselves for a very uncertain future, but there are really only two major players, Amazon and Google. Everyone else is trying to figure out the best way to go bankrupt or to become something else, not publishers, God knows, but “content providers” for whatever word vessels the future will offer. From their point of view, the book was just a “platform” that had its day but it’s done now, and so what? For its part, Amazon is merely doing what capitalist companies have always done: position itself to capture as much monopoly power as it can. That’s all this is really about. But for a few of us the question is still: How in the hell is “literature” supposed to come out of this?

Even allowing for the possibility that Amazon will be a benign monopoly and will encourage or at least tolerate the continued unruly flowering of this thing we have known as literature, if you thought it was hard to find a book spine out at a superstore, try finding that book of poetry that changes your life and that you didn’t know you were looking for in the web’s ether, “in the cloud,” as the techno-hip say. You’d have better luck finding a speck of gold in a bucket of sand.

(Source: yimmyayo)

Posted at 9:33pm.